Review tools, MCP functions, CLI commands, SET inputs, and AGENTS.md generator outputs as agent-facing contracts. Use when a tool description, schema, workflow input, or generated instruction may be ambiguous, unsafe, noisy, or hard for agents to call correctly.
---
name: agent-tool-contract-review
description: Review tools, MCP functions, CLI commands, SET inputs, and AGENTS.md generator outputs as agent-facing contracts. Use when a tool description, schema, workflow input, or generated instruction may be ambiguous, unsafe, noisy, or hard for agents to call correctly.
license: MIT
metadata:
abvx_status: experimental
abvx_origin: adapted
---
# Agent Tool Contract Review
Use this skill to make a tool easier and safer for agents to call.
## Use When
- designing or reviewing MCP tools, CLI wrappers, GitHub Actions inputs, or SET planner outputs;
- changing AGENTS.md generator templates that tell agents which commands or tools to use;
- a tool has ambiguous parameters, hidden side effects, noisy output, or weak error messages;
- agent runs repeatedly misuse a command or need human intervention after avoidable failures.
- adapting an external skill, contract, or workflow into the local skill network.
## Adaptation Delta
Before writing an adapted external skill, classify each material source fragment in `templates/adaptation-delta.yaml`:
- `KEEP`: retain source mechanics or schema without semantic change;
- `ADAPT`: change paths, tools, authority, terminology, or environment assumptions;
- `ADD`: introduce local guardrails, routing, verification, or project boundaries;
- `REJECT`: exclude a fragment and record the reason plus source reference.
Every entry requires a stable ID and source fragment reference. Present the complete delta to the owner before writing. Record `APPROVED`, `REVISE`, or `REJECTED`; silence is not approval. Preserve attribution and license constraints independently of the classification.
## Review Dimensions
- purpose: what job the tool owns and what it does not own;
- schema: required fields, optional fields, enums, defaults, and validation;
- authority: read-only, proposal-only, write, destructive, external side effect;
- output: compact, structured, parseable, and stable enough for downstream agents;
- errors: actionable messages with the smallest useful recovery step;
- idempotency: safe retries, duplicate handling, and idempotency keys when needed;
- auditability: logs, dry-run mode, preview mode, and human approval boundary.
## Workflow
1. Identify the agent-facing tool surface and its intended caller.
2. Classify the authority level: `read`, `plan`, `proposal`, `write`, or `destructive`.
3. Check whether the name, description, schema, and examples make the safe path obvious.
4. Check whether the output can be consumed without reading a large log.
5. Check error paths and retry semantics.
6. Recommend the smallest contract change: rename, tighter schema, dry-run, better error, structured output, or approval gate.
## Output Shape
Use:
- verdict: `CONTRACT_OK`, `CONTRACT_AMBIGUOUS`, or `CONTRACT_UNSAFE`;
- tool surface reviewed;
- authority level;
- contract findings;
- smallest contract changes;
- tests or smoke checks.
## Guardrails
- Do not redesign the whole tool when a schema or description change is enough.
- Do not hide write or destructive behavior behind friendly wording.
- Do not require agents to infer defaults that can be encoded in schema.
- Do not make logs the primary machine interface when structured output is feasible.
- Do not silently omit or rewrite upstream behavior during adaptation.
## Provenance
Adapted from tool-design patterns in `muratcankoylan/Agent-Skills-for-Context-Engineering`, plus MakerSkills' explicit keep/adapt/add porting report. Narrowed for SET, AGENTS.md generator, MCP, CLI, and provider-neutral skill adaptation, with an added `REJECT` disposition and owner gate.
When Claude will use it
Use when a tool description, schema, workflow input, or generated instruction may be ambiguous, unsafe, noisy, or hard for agents to call correctly.
---
name: agent-friction-ledger
description: Capture recurring agent-development friction as a local, privacy-safe Markdown report. Use only when the user explicitly requests a friction review of blockers, misleading errors, missing documentation, incompatible tools, or manual workarounds that should improve a doc, tool, skill, process, or evaluation.
---
---
name: agent-learning-layer-triage
description: Route reusable agent learning after an error, success pattern, review finding, or repeated workflow. Use when deciding whether an improvement belongs in the model prompt, memory/context note, durable docs, SKILL.md, checklist, script/tool, eval, golden fixture, or should be rejected as overfit.
---
---
name: agent-operations-contract
description: Define and review concrete agent capability cards, asynchronous operation receipts, decision receipts with revalidation, isolated and trust-graded memory scopes, and evidence-backed provider or tool registry entries. Use when a project introduces named agents, scheduled or long-running work, durable decisions or memory, provider routing, MCP tools, or external-action approval boundaries.
---