Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for SSR, template rendering, route loaders, hydration payloads, server-client render boundaries, and template-to-handler enforcement gaps. Use when the user asks to inspect SSR or template routes, trace render context or hydration data, compare template gating with handler enforcement, explain preview or hidden-route rendering, or connect render pipeline behavior to the decisive branch. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
---
name: competition-template-render-path
description: Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for SSR, template rendering, route loaders, hydration payloads, server-client render boundaries, and template-to-handler enforcement gaps. Use when the user asks to inspect SSR or template routes, trace render context or hydration data, compare template gating with handler enforcement, explain preview or hidden-route rendering, or connect render pipeline behavior to the decisive branch. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
---
# Competition Template Render Path
Use this skill only as a downstream specialization after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` is already active and has established sandbox assumptions, node ownership, and evidence priorities. If that has not happened yet, return to `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` first.
Use this skill when the decisive bug or artifact lives in route resolution, server render context, template data, or hydration handoff rather than in a plain JSON API alone.
Reply in Simplified Chinese unless the user explicitly requests English.
## Quick Start
1. Map the render chain in order: route resolution, loader or data fetch, template or component context, response HTML, hydration payload, and client takeover.
2. Record host, route params, preview toggles, tenant or host switches, and server-only variables before mutating anything.
3. Compare template gating with loader or handler enforcement.
4. Preserve one successful render and one failing render path with the smallest delta.
5. Reproduce the smallest request-to-render branch that proves the decisive behavior.
## Workflow
### 1. Map Route To Render Context
- Record host, path, route match, loader, template, layout, hydration blob, and client boot chunk for the active view.
- Note whether the response is SSR HTML, static HTML plus hydration, edge-rendered content, or a template fragment used by another route.
- Keep server-only context and client-visible context separate.
### 2. Trace Template And Enforcement Boundaries
- Show where permissions, feature flags, preview state, tenant selection, or host-based switches are applied.
- Compare template-level gating, loader-level gating, and backend handler enforcement instead of trusting any one layer.
- Record hidden fields, inline data, hydration JSON, meta tags, or alternate partials that expose the decisive branch.
### 3. Reduce To The Decisive Render Path
- Compress the result to the smallest sequence: request -> route match -> loader or template context -> rendered output or hidden data -> resulting effect.
- State clearly whether the decisive weakness lives in route selection, template context construction, server-client hydration handoff, or mismatched enforcement between render and handler.
- If the task becomes mostly emitted bundle recovery or source map reconstruction, hand off to the tighter bundle skill.
## Read This Reference
- Load `references/template-render-path.md` for the render checklist, hydration checklist, and evidence packaging.
## What To Preserve
- Route names, loader names, templates, layouts, hydration keys, and host or preview switches
- One success or failure pair that shows where render-layer behavior diverges
- One minimal request-to-render sequence that reaches the decisive branch
When Claude will use it
Use when the user asks to inspect SSR or template routes, trace render context or hydration data, compare template gating with handler enforcement, explain preview or hidden-route rendering, or connect render pipeline behavior to the decisive branch.
---
name: competition-ad-certificate-abuse
description: Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AD CS, certificate templates, enrollment rights, EKUs, SAN controls, PKINIT, certificate mapping, and cert-based privilege paths. Use when the user asks about ESC-style abuse, certificate templates, enrollment agents, EKUs, SAN or subject controls, smartcard or PKINIT logon, CA policy, or how an issued cert turns into accepted privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
---
---
name: competition-agent-cloud
description: Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for AI-agent, prompt-injection, MCP or toolchain, cloud, container, CI/CD, and supply-chain challenges. Use when the user asks to analyze prompt-to-tool flows, retrieval poisoning, mounted secrets, deployment drift, runtime-vs-manifest mismatches, registry provenance, or CI-produced artifacts under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
---
---
name: competition-android-hooking
description: Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Android APK hooking, Frida tracing, request-signing recovery, SSL pinning bypass, JNI boundary inspection, and app trust-boundary analysis. Use when the user asks to hook an APK, inspect signer logic, trace Java or native boundaries, bypass pinning or root checks, inspect shared prefs or app databases, or replay accepted mobile requests. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
---
---
name: competition-browser-persistence
description: Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for browser cookies, localStorage, sessionStorage, IndexedDB, Cache Storage, service workers, offline caches, and client-side session persistence. Use when the user asks to inspect browser state, replay cached auth or session behavior, explain why a page behaves differently after load, or trace how stored client state changes requests, rendering, or access. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
---